Analysis
[1] "一般職業紹介状況:新規求人倍率(新規学卒者を除きパートタイムを含む)【季節調整値】:厚生労働省"
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
1999 0.92
2000 0.97 0.96 0.98 1.00 1.02 1.05 1.09 1.08 1.11 1.13 1.15 1.14
2001 1.15 1.10 1.04 1.07 1.07 1.04 1.04 0.99 0.96 0.91 0.91 0.87
2002 0.88 0.88 0.91 0.90 0.93 0.94 0.94 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.96 1.00
2003 1.00 1.00 1.01 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.06 1.10 1.11 1.16 1.17 1.20
2004 1.19 1.18 1.22 1.25 1.25 1.27 1.28 1.30 1.35 1.40 1.41 1.41
2005 1.42 1.46 1.43 1.43 1.44 1.47 1.48 1.47 1.48 1.43 1.52 1.54
2006 1.56 1.59 1.53 1.55 1.63 1.58 1.56 1.56 1.55 1.53 1.58 1.60
2007 1.52 1.56 1.60 1.58 1.56 1.54 1.53 1.51 1.42 1.46 1.46 1.42
2008 1.43 1.41 1.32 1.36 1.32 1.29 1.26 1.25 1.20 1.13 1.04 0.98
2009 0.87 0.77 0.78 0.77 0.76 0.78 0.78 0.79 0.81 0.80 0.79 0.80
2010 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.85 0.86 0.88 0.89 0.91 0.94 0.96 0.96 0.98
2011 1.01 0.99 0.98 0.95 0.98 1.00 1.07 1.05 1.14 1.15 1.17 1.19
2012 1.21 1.23 1.23 1.25 1.29 1.29 1.30 1.32 1.27 1.30 1.32 1.32
2013 1.34 1.38 1.38 1.41 1.43 1.47 1.47 1.50 1.50 1.57 1.57 1.59
2014 1.64 1.69 1.63 1.63 1.63 1.65 1.67 1.65 1.66 1.69 1.69 1.75
2015 1.77 1.72 1.74 1.76 1.77 1.79 1.84 1.84 1.87 1.85 1.89 1.89
2016 2.03 1.95 1.94 2.05 2.04 2.01 2.02 2.08 2.09 2.09 2.12 2.15
2017 2.15 2.17 2.14 2.18 2.28 2.22 2.24 2.24 2.24 2.35 2.32 2.38
2018 2.37 2.35 2.38 2.37 2.38 2.42 2.41 2.39 2.44 2.40 2.40 2.40
2019 2.48 2.50 2.42 2.48 2.43 2.36 2.34 2.45 2.28 2.44
Call:
lm(formula = value ~ ID)
Residuals:
Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
-0.08793 -0.01523 0.00473 0.02309 0.04844
Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
(Intercept) 0.7403104 0.0107115 69.11 <0.0000000000000002 ***
ID 0.0156640 0.0004667 33.56 <0.0000000000000002 ***
---
Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
Residual standard error: 0.03281 on 37 degrees of freedom
Multiple R-squared: 0.9682, Adjusted R-squared: 0.9673
F-statistic: 1126 on 1 and 37 DF, p-value: < 0.00000000000000022
Two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test
data: lm_residuals and rnorm(n = length(lm_residuals), mean = 0, sd = sd(lm_residuals))
D = 0.25641, p-value = 0.1547
alternative hypothesis: two-sided
Durbin-Watson test
data: value ~ ID
DW = 0.55835, p-value = 0.00000001066
alternative hypothesis: true autocorrelation is greater than 0
studentized Breusch-Pagan test
data: value ~ ID
BP = 0.77062, df = 1, p-value = 0.38
Box-Ljung test
data: lm_residuals
X-squared = 19.702, df = 1, p-value = 0.000009051
Call:
lm(formula = value ~ ID)
Residuals:
Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
-0.282399 -0.036883 0.003114 0.046774 0.118944
Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
(Intercept) 1.4013731 0.0148836 94.16 <0.0000000000000002 ***
ID 0.0143336 0.0003115 46.01 <0.0000000000000002 ***
---
Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
Residual standard error: 0.06677 on 80 degrees of freedom
Multiple R-squared: 0.9636, Adjusted R-squared: 0.9631
F-statistic: 2117 on 1 and 80 DF, p-value: < 0.00000000000000022
Two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test
data: lm_residuals and rnorm(n = length(lm_residuals), mean = 0, sd = sd(lm_residuals))
D = 0.12195, p-value = 0.5785
alternative hypothesis: two-sided
Durbin-Watson test
data: value ~ ID
DW = 0.5526, p-value = 0.0000000000000008823
alternative hypothesis: true autocorrelation is greater than 0
studentized Breusch-Pagan test
data: value ~ ID
BP = 11.229, df = 1, p-value = 0.0008052
Box-Ljung test
data: lm_residuals
X-squared = 40.423, df = 1, p-value = 0.0000000002046
Call:
lm(formula = value ~ ID)
Residuals:
Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
-0.18283 -0.14109 -0.05716 0.10123 0.46846
Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
(Intercept) 0.844804 0.044769 18.870 < 0.0000000000000002 ***
ID 0.006738 0.001298 5.192 0.00000289 ***
---
Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
Residual standard error: 0.1698 on 57 degrees of freedom
Multiple R-squared: 0.3211, Adjusted R-squared: 0.3092
F-statistic: 26.96 on 1 and 57 DF, p-value: 0.000002892
Two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test
data: lm_residuals and rnorm(n = length(lm_residuals), mean = 0, sd = sd(lm_residuals))
D = 0.22034, p-value = 0.1141
alternative hypothesis: two-sided
Durbin-Watson test
data: value ~ ID
DW = 0.047135, p-value < 0.00000000000000022
alternative hypothesis: true autocorrelation is greater than 0
studentized Breusch-Pagan test
data: value ~ ID
BP = 19.669, df = 1, p-value = 0.00000921
Box-Ljung test
data: lm_residuals
X-squared = 50.695, df = 1, p-value = 0.000000000001079
Call:
lm(formula = value ~ ID)
Residuals:
Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
-0.277584 -0.036177 0.000592 0.045371 0.119432
Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
(Intercept) 1.454382 0.015148 96.01 <0.0000000000000002 ***
ID 0.014144 0.000329 42.99 <0.0000000000000002 ***
---
Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
Residual standard error: 0.06668 on 77 degrees of freedom
Multiple R-squared: 0.96, Adjusted R-squared: 0.9595
F-statistic: 1848 on 1 and 77 DF, p-value: < 0.00000000000000022
Two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test
data: lm_residuals and rnorm(n = length(lm_residuals), mean = 0, sd = sd(lm_residuals))
D = 0.11392, p-value = 0.6878
alternative hypothesis: two-sided
Durbin-Watson test
data: value ~ ID
DW = 0.57238, p-value = 0.000000000000009171
alternative hypothesis: true autocorrelation is greater than 0
studentized Breusch-Pagan test
data: value ~ ID
BP = 11.471, df = 1, p-value = 0.0007069
Box-Ljung test
data: lm_residuals
X-squared = 38.322, df = 1, p-value = 0.0000000005998